PCB Failure Analysis

PCB Failure Analysis: Identification and Testing of Defects

From cheap toys and smartphones to sophisticated computers and radar detector systems, printed circuit boards (PCB) are critical components for today’s electronic and industrial technology. Almost every electronic device has one of these self-contained modules of complex interconnected electronic components, which include resistors, capacitors, transistors, diodes and fuses.

Common Types of PCBs

Printed circuit boards can cover a single task or multiple functions. PCBs come in three major types:

  • Single-sided
  • Double-sided
  • Multilayer

The electronics industry drives toward more miniaturization, requiring design engineers to produce faster, smaller — and more complex — circuit board technology, which has a higher quality and costs less.

It is important for a printed circuit board to perform its function and support the larger electronic device. Consequently, PCB manufacturers must have a system in place that monitors and tests each component to ensure that it meets various standards and delivers maximum performance.

When a component fails, analysts must utilize various processes, tools and techniques. With accuracy, they must determine why the device failed and how to prevent future failures. The following processes present unique challenges for electronics failure analysis:

  • Increased density
  • Higher lead-free process temperature requirements
  • Hazardous material
  • Recycling requirements
  • The need to tune PCBs to precise values
  • Other associated changes in PCB manufacturing

Root Cause Analysis

The fabrication of a complete PCB assembly requires an array of machines and materials, which include:

  • Screen printers
  • Conveyors
  • Pick-and-place systems
  • Reflow ovens
  • Automated optical inspection
  • Solder paste
  • Different components

Some machines have automated features that perform checks at various points, and operators perform visual inspections before, during or immediately after the completion of a task.

Nonetheless, many PCBs will fail the final test. When a problem does occur, it is important to perform an effective electronics failure analysis in order to obtain clear and precise details about the source of the problem — and to ensure that it does not happen again.

PCB Failure Analysis Feedback

The technician must conduct a root cause analysis to identify the cause of the failure — not the symptoms — and take corrective action to fix the issue. Failure analysis also provides invaluable feedback to design engineers on how to:

  • Correct minor faults that might have gone unnoticed during the initial design
  • Improve the product

Any company that produces electronic hardware strives to achieve zero-defect production. To realize this objective, manufacturers must have the capability to perform some level of printed circuit board failure analysis. Some companies rely on outside expertise for more complex problems.

For many high reliability systems — such as oil rigs, space satellites, implantable medical devices and other systems — failures can be devastating. In the case of consumer products, a single failure mode, which can replicate thousands or millions of times, can have a huge impact on the bottom line.

Electronic device failure analysis provides a systematic process to help organizations investigate and understand why an electronic part failed. Depending on the nature of the failure, an effective investigation can identify the failure mode, mechanism and elements, such as stresses inducing the failure and other issues.

For example, solder joint defects make up a large percentage of PCB failures. Manufacturers can discover the root cause of the defective joints — such as a lack of solder paste, a gap between the PCB pad and component lead, or poor reflow profile — and then implement preventative measures. To eliminate future failures, possible solutions may be to avoid solder paste contamination or ensure the correct aspect ratio. The methods used in the analysis depend on the severity of the failure and the type of issue. They can range from simple electrical measurements to the evaluation of sample cross-sections under a microscope.

An effective and efficient root cause analysis ensures that manufacturers can initiate the necessary corrective action to prevent reoccurrence of the problem. Failure analysis processes evaluate the reliability of a component product under operation and determine how to improve the product.

Common Types of PCB Failure Analysis Tests

There are a number of tests suitable for identifying defects. When the failure analyst understands the faults and how to prevent them, the company can improve the production process as well as the assemblies it manufactures.

The traditional techniques used for printed circuit board failure analysis focus on the “slice and dice” method. This technique employs a combination of external techniques, such as electrical testing, visual inspection, X-ray and cross-sectioning to the relevant area.

The following PCB tests have the highest success rate and offer advantages for PCB manufacturers:

1. Micro-sectioning Analysis
Micro-sectioning, sometimes called Cross-sectioning or Metallographic Preparation, refers to a PCB testing method used to investigate:

  • Thermo-mechanical failures
  • Component defects
  • Opens or shorts
  • Processing failures due to solder reflow
  • Raw material evaluations

The failure analyst removes a two-dimensional slice out of a sample, which uncovers features within the board. Considered a destructive testing method, micro-sectioning analysis provides the technician with a precise technique that isolates the relevant electronic component and removes the part from the PCB sample.

The technician puts the component into an epoxy resin or other potting medium and leaves it to cure and solidify. After the component cures, the technician uses an abrasion technique to recede and expose the component, and polishes the part until it is reflective and ready for testing. Micro-sectioning requires the analyst to compare the sample against another functioning component. One advantage of this testing method is the ability to position the sample on a flat surface and invest each of its parts together.

Electron and optical microscopy equipment can examine plate thickness, intermittent metallic layer thickness or failures to solder joints. The analyst must highlight the damage and identify the cause of the destruction. PC-MS-810 and ASTM E3 quality standards govern micro-sectioning tests.

2. Solderability Testing
According to IPC-T-50, “base solderability” describes the ease with which a metal or metal alloy material surface can be wetted by molten solder under minimum realistic conditions. Often, the PCB manufacturing process can be the source of assembly problems, especially issues related to oxidation and misapplications of the solder mask. To minimize the probability of failure, many manufactures test component and PCB pad solder ability to ensure the robustness of the surface and increase the probability of forming a reliable solder joint.

The solderability failure method evaluates the strength and quality of wetting of a solder by reproducing the contact between the solder and the material. The wetting balance process measures the wetting force and the time from contact to wetting force generation. Solderability testing can verify that the components will meet specifications and quality standards.

The technique also helps determine what effect, if any, storage has on solder components in PCBs. It also provides an accurate measure of why a fault may have occurred. Solderability testing works for a variety of applications, including:

  • PCB coating evaluation
  • Solder evaluation
  • Flux evaluation
  • Benchmarking
  • Quality control

The failure analyst must have the experience to differentiate the various surface conditions and understand the acceptable requirements of the testing technique. The analyst must also have the necessary expertise to accurately apply the specific conditions. The IPC-J-STD-002 and 003 standards govern all solderability tests.

3. PCB Contamination Testing
Contamination can cause a variety of issues, including corrosion, degradation, metallization and rapid deterioration of wire bond interconnects. Although printed circuit board processing and assembly take place in an extremely clean environment designed to keep the air and components free of contamination, infection does occur and represents one the most common causes of part failure.

Human byproducts, handling, flux residues and reaction products are often sources of contamination. Many manufacturers employ aggressive chemistry processes during PCB fabrication, including the following:

  • Copper etching liquid
  • Hot air leveling fluxes
  • Electrolytic solutions
  • Water soluble soldering

The use of chemicals typically requires a cleaning process. The electronic industry introduced ionic contamination testing, which measures the cleaning efficiency and stability of the cleaning process. Contamination testing measures the amount of ionic contamination contained in a sample. The process of testing for contamination involves the immersion of the PCB sample into a solution. The solution dissolves the ionic contamination, which causes a change in the constitution of the solution and has a significant influence on the values or readings.

The technician measures the change in the resistance of the solution solvent — a change in resistance that a failure analyst can measure. Then, the analyst plots the contamination level on a contamination-testing curve and compares the value with industry standards.

When a reading exceeds an established level, it confirms that the manufacturer has a problem with the cleaning process. This can cause detrimental effects, including corrosion and electrochemical migration, when parts remain in the component. This dissolving technique can detect even the smallest parts.

One of the advantages of contamination analysis is its precision and accuracy. Contamination analysis must meet the standards of IPC-TM-650, method 2-3-25 for iconic cleanliness.

4. Optical Microscopy/SEM
Optical microscopy may be one of the most popular and preferred testing methods used for detecting faults, defects and problems associated with soldering and assembly. Many customers choose optical microscopy because of its speed and accuracy. The process uses a high power microscope with visible light. The microscope, which can reach up to 1000X, has a small depth field and shows features in a single plane. Board integrity represents a major concern and frequent cause of failure in electronics. Microscopy testing can verify improper construction, which can lead to stresses that can expose flaws at certain cross sections.

Sometimes PCB failure analysis requires more powerful magnification tools. Scanning electron microscopes or SEMs offer a highly-effective testing technique for performing semiconductor die failure analysis. Even if a defect on an integrated circuit measures only a few nanometers wide, SEM provides the failure analyst detailed images at higher magnifications, up to 120,000X. It is typical to have magnifications of 50,000 to 100,000X, and feature resolutions down to 25 angstroms. The analyst produces a recording and record of the findings based on the images.

With SEM technology, the depth of the field provides failure analysts a three-dimensional view of the sample. SEM examinations can verify semiconductor die metallization, integrity and quality. SEM also provides evidence of heat treatment and identifies the metal or alloy used. Many analysts pair SEM with micro-sectioning testing.

5. X-ray Inspection
Many X-rays provide users a powerful tool for non-invasive failure analysis. With a choice of basic film X-ray, real time X-ray and 3-dimensional X-ray systems, users can employ the tools to detect actual or potential defects. They can also inspect a component that has hidden joints or parts located underneath a chip. The analyst uses an X-ray inspection instead of visible light equipment to evaluate the PCB.

Even with basic X-ray inspection capabilities, technicians can conduct the following types of internal component examinations:

  • Internal particles
  • Internal wire dress
  • Die attach quality
  • Voids in the sealing lid
  • Substrate /printing wiring board trace integrity
  • Insufficient excessive or poor solder

The advantage of this testing method is the ability to detect surface and internal flaws in a non-destructive manner while keeping samples in pre-testing condition.

Common PCB Challenges

On top of rapid innovation, shrinking components and sophisticated circuit geometries, the fabrication of a printed circuit board consists of many steps and moving parts. The nature of the manufacturing process provides numerous opportunities to introduce a defect in the mix, unintentionally.
Consequently, failure analysts face a variety of challenges when finding manufacturing defects:

  • High-speed Printed Circuit Boards (HSCBs)- HSCBs, which have grown more complex and use a variety of integrated components, continue to grow in popularity. However, the components require boards that are composed of two or three materials that increase the possibility of failure in extreme high-speed applications. Failures also occur from pins and chip placed in an incorrect manner on the board.
  • Lead-free Assembly Process- The lead-free assembly process requires a higher temperature and traditional tin-lead solder, which leads to higher temperatures for the reflow and wave soldering. This results in an adverse effect on the solder joint and electronic components. Check out NTS Tin Whisker Testing services.
  • Plated Through Hole Barrel Cracking- Barrel fatigue, which is the circumferential cracking of the copper plating that forms the plated through hole (PTH wall), is the most prevalent failure mode. It occurs as a result of differential expansion between the copper plating and the out-of-plane coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the printed board.
  • Correct Surface Finish Selection- The most important decision for the electronic assembly may be the surface furnish, which affects the process yield, the amount of rework necessary, field failure rate, the ability to test, the scrap rate and the cost.
  • Conductive Anodic Filament- Conductive Anodic Filaments (CAF) or metallic electro-migration describes an electro-chemical process that involves the transport of a metal across a nonmetallic medium under the influence of an applied electric field. The condition causes current leakage, intermittent electrical shorts and dielectric breakdown between conductors in PCBs.

Nonetheless, PCB manufacturers must take the proper care to adhere to exact tolerances and specifications to avoid failures. This requires an effective root cause analysis to investigate and probe into components and systems, and make the necessary quality improvements.

Contact NTS
In any production environment, the printed circuit board failure analysis is a critical process for the organization. Root cause analysis provides manufacturers with a tool that can bolster PCB fabrication processes, improve identification of failure characteristics, troubleshoot and improve overall efficiency.

NTS is a leading provider of failure analysis services and can help you transform your faults, defects and malfunctions into a valuable source of learning and process improvement. Contact an NTS representative to learn more about how to optimize your printed circuit board failure analysis testing.